MathGroup Archive 2003

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Wierdness with the laplacian

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg45142] Re: [mg45132] Wierdness with the laplacian
  • From: "Ingolf Dahl" <ingolf.dahl at telia.com>
  • Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 06:55:17 -0500 (EST)
  • Reply-to: "Ingolf Dahl" <ingolf.dahl at telia.com>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

If you apply Simplify to your result, it will look nicer. Csc[z] is
the same as 1/Sin[z]. But that of course also Mathematica should know,
and why it does not do this simplification in the first place I do not
know.

Ingolf Dahl

citing Peter Jay Salzman <p at dirac.org>:

> Hi all,
>
> When I do:
>
> 	<<Calculus`VectorAnalysis`
> 	SetCoordinates[Spherical[r, theta, phi]
> 	Laplacian[ Exp[r^2] ]
>
> Mathematica gives:
>
>                 2                     2
>                r   2                 r   4
> Csc[theta] (6 E   r  Sin[theta] + 4 E   r  Sin[theta])
> ------------------------------------------------------
>                            2
>                           r
>
> Which is wrong since Exp[r^2] is not a function of theta or phi.
>
>
> Why is Mathematica giving this result?
>
> Thanks!
> Pete
>
> 


  • Prev by Date: Better Set or Set Delayed ?
  • Next by Date: Re: Wierdness with the laplacian
  • Previous by thread: Re: Wierdness with the laplacian
  • Next by thread: Re: Wierdness with the laplacian