MathGroup Archive 2003

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: how to get Mathematica to reduce simple expressions?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg45206] Re: how to get Mathematica to reduce simple expressions?
  • From: drbob at bigfoot.com (Bobby R. Treat)
  • Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 05:56:22 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <brs58p$ika$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

(a^(3/2)*(m^2/(m^2 + t^2*a^2*h^2))^(3/2))/
   ((m^2*a)/(m^2 + t^2*a^2*h^2))^(3/2); 
FullSimplify[%, {a > 0}]

1

or

PowerExpand[(a^(3/2)*(m^2/(m^2 + t^2*a^2*h^2))^(3/2))/
   ((m^2*a)/(m^2 + t^2*a^2*h^2))^(3/2)]

1

If a < 0 or complex, the value may depend on a choice of branch for
#^(3/2)&. If a==0, it isn't defined. So... I'd say Mathematica is
doing it right.

Bobby

Peter Jay Salzman <p at dirac.org> wrote in message news:<brs58p$ika$1 at smc.vnet.net>...
> Hi all,
> 
> I've been using Mathematica to check some of my calculations, and one of the
> integrals,
> 
> 4 Pi Integrate[r^2 Bra[r,t] Ket[r,t], {r, 0, Infinity}, 
>    Assumptions -> {Re[m^2*a/(m^2 + t^2*a^2*h^2)] > 0}]
>    // FullSimplify
> 
> 
> 
> yielded the result:
> 
> 
> 
> Out[176]=
>                    2
>         3/2       m        3/2
>        a    (-------------)
>               2    2  2  2
>              m  + t  a  h 
>        -----------------------
>                2
>               m  a       3/2
>           (-------------)
>             2    2  2  2
>            m  + t  a  h
> 
> 
> which is 1.  i'm more curious than anything else:  how do i coax Mathematica to
> reduce this seemingly simple expression?
> 
> why is Mathematica doing this?
> 
> thanks!
> pete


  • Prev by Date: Re: Solving inequalities.
  • Next by Date: RE: How to have shaded background for just a portion of a plot?
  • Previous by thread: how to get Mathematica to reduce simple expressions?
  • Next by thread: Orthogonal Trajectories