[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Trouble with Integrate
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg39272] Re: Trouble with Integrate
*From*: "David W. Cantrell" <DWCantrell at sigmaxi.org>
*Date*: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 03:07:45 -0500 (EST)
*References*: <b1t66t$944$1@smc.vnet.net>
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
"Marko Vojinovic" <vojinovi at panet.co.yu> wrote:
> Consider the function:
>
> f = Sqrt[1+x^4] -x^2
>
> Upon asking to
>
> Integrate[f,{x,0,Infinity}]
>
> Mathematica 4.0 answers:
>
> -Infinity
>
> which is not correct.
Alas, so does my Version 4.2.0.0 for Windows.
> However,
>
> NIntegrate[f,{x,0,Infinity}]
>
> gives the correct (numerical) answer:
> 1.23605
>
> The correct (analytical, i.e.. exact) answer to the integral is:
>
> Gamma[1/4] Gamma[1/4] / 6 Sqrt[Pi]
>
> which can be obtained after some paperwork.
Using Integrate[f,{x,0,a}], I got an answer involving EllipticF. Its limit
as a -> Infinity is correct, although Mathematica cannot find that limit.
> However, if I ask
>
> Integrate[1/(Sqrt[1+x^4] + x^2),{x,0,Infinity}]
>
> (this integrand is equivalent to f) one gets a complicated answer in
> terms of EllipticF.
Strange. My later version doesn't give an answer, merely rewriting the
problem in 2D form.
> Meanwhile, when I ask Mathematica 3.0 the same set of
> questions, I get correct answers,
Aargh! Now I wish that I'd left version 3 on my computer!
Please report these problems to the proper authorities, if you haven't
already done so.
David
> and analytical integration gives answer
> in terms of Gamma. Two questions:
>
> 1) Why does version 4.0 give so fairly incorrect result "-Infinity" for
> the first integral?
> 2) How can I 'switch off' the use of elliptic functions and/or 'force'
> Mathematica to use Gamma?
Prev by Date:
**Re: Keyboard problem**
Next by Date:
**Re: finding periodicity in a set**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Trouble with Integrate**
Next by thread:
**Re: Trouble with Integrate**
| |