MathGroup Archive 2003

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: successive over relaxation

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg38802] Re: successive over relaxation
  • From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
  • Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 04:11:44 -0500 (EST)
  • Organization: Universitaet Leipzig
  • References: <200301090940.EAA07078@smc.vnet.net> <avm4ji$na0$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Reply-to: kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Hi,

and

Developer`SparseLinearSolve[]

does not a better job than any SOR ??

Regards
  Jens

Selwyn Hollis wrote:
> 
> Mike,
> 
> I doubt you'll find what you're looking for. I recently spent some time
> trying to concoct an efficient Gauss-Seidel-SOR program in Mathematica
> and left it before getting anything I was happy with. There are inherent
> difficulties, I think. However, I believe it's an very interesting
> problem to find the "best" way of implementing SOR in Mathematica.
> 
> ----
> Selwyn Hollis
> 
> Mike wrote:
> > Does anyone know of any sources of examples of successive over relaxation
> > method using mathematica?
> >
> > I came across a link on mathsource but the notebook actually links to ITPACK
> > method. I was interested in a full implementation within mathematica.
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >


  • Prev by Date: Re: FileNameDialog
  • Next by Date: Re: "Autoload in AddOns" doesn't load?
  • Previous by thread: Re: successive over relaxation
  • Next by thread: Re: successive over relaxation