MathGroup Archive 2003

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: solving matrix equations or joining mathgroup

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg38889] Re: solving matrix equations or joining mathgroup
  • From: "Steve Luttrell" <luttrell at _removemefirst_westmal.demon.co.uk>
  • Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 05:39:10 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <b05qir$29b$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

You can use the OPLinearAlgebra package
(http://library.wolfram.com/database/MathSource/4271/) to solve this type of
noncommutative algebra problem.

--
Steve Luttrell
West Malvern, UK

"K=E4rger Luise" <Luise.Kaerger at dlr.de> wrote in message
news:b05qir$29b$1 at smc.vnet.net...
>
> Dear Sir or Madam,
> I'm trying to solve quite extensive matrix equations in symbolic notation
> with Mathematica and have problems with getting symbolic results.
>
> ---
> The problem can be shortly described as follows:
> simple example:  From equation A B == C with the kown matrices A and C i
> would like to get a result  like B = A^(-1) C    (and not all the matrix
> elements of B).
> another example: By using the function 'Solve(A+B==C, {B11,B12,B21,B22})'
> with A, B and C being 2x2-matrices I would prefer to indicate only matrix
> {B} as the unknown variable instead of writing all the matrix elements
{B11,
> B12, B21, B22} (which gets quite painful if you have matrices of higher
> order).
> ---
>
> Thanks a lot for your help!
> Luise K=E4rger
>
>
>
>




  • Prev by Date: What is a smart way to do this?
  • Next by Date: Re: Mathematica, Windows 2000 and Service Pack 3 (The good, the bad and the ugly ?)
  • Previous by thread: solving matrix equations or joining mathgroup
  • Next by thread: Mathematica, Windows 2000 and Service Pack 3 (The good, the bad and the ugly ?)