MathGroup Archive 2003

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Simple recursion problem: there must be a simple answer!

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg42681] Re: [mg42654] Simple recursion problem: there must be a simple answer!
  • From: Dr Bob <drbob at bigfoot.com>
  • Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 06:20:59 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <200307190719.DAA16965@smc.vnet.net>
  • Reply-to: drbob at bigfoot.com
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Well, of course it's an infinite loop, if the test is 1 < 10.  Maybe you 
meant i < 10.

Bobby

On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 03:19:38 -0400 (EDT), George W. Gilchrist 
<gwgilc at wm.edu> wrote:

> I have spent the better part of a day trying to figure out how to keep 
> the
> following from going into an infinite loop. Such a simple thing to 
> program
> in other systems, but how the heck do you do it in Mathematica? It is 
> simply a
> case where the value of p in the next generation is a function of p in 
> the
> previous and the result is written to a vector for later reference.
>
> AA = 1.0;
> Aa = 1.0;
> aa = 0.5;
> freqP[0] = 0;
> freqP[1] = 1;
> freqP[P_] := (AA*P^2 + Aa* P*(1 - P))/
> (AA*P^2 + Aa*2*P*(1 - P) + aa *(1 - P)^2);
> p = Table[0.7, {10}]
> For[i = 1, 1 < 10, i++, p[[i + 1]] = freqP[p[[i]]]]
>
> Any suggestions of Mathematica books that would be helpful for figuring
> something like this out in a few minutes instead of a few days? Thank you
> for any help.
>
> ==================================================================
> George W. Gilchrist                        Email #1: gwgilc at wm.edu
> Department of Biology, Box 8795          Email #2: kitesci at cox.net
> College of William & Mary                    Phone: (757) 221-7751
> Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795                    Fax: (757) 221-6483
> http://gwgilc.people.wm.edu/
>
>
>



-- 
majort at cox-internet.com
Bobby R. Treat


  • Prev by Date: Re: Series
  • Next by Date: Re: Simple recursion problem: there must be a simple answer!
  • Previous by thread: Simple recursion problem: there must be a simple answer!
  • Next by thread: Re: Simple recursion problem: there must be a simple answer!