Re: loading packages
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg42165] Re: loading packages
- From: Paul Abbott <paul at physics.uwa.edu.au>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 02:49:40 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: The University of Western Australia
- References: <bcmoa1$slg$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
In article <bcmoa1$slg$1 at smc.vnet.net>, "David Park" <djmp at earthlink.net> wrote: > You absolutely have to load the package first! Actually this is not true. Instead you can just load the package stubs using << Graphics` This will cause the appropriate Graphics package to be loaded as required. This approach is often more useful than loading a specific package. > It is also generally better to use Needs statements than << statements. They > can be reevaluated without causing any problems. This is only true and required if the package itself has not been written correctly. Re-loading a package _should_ work properly. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Abbott Phone: +61 8 9380 2734 School of Physics, M013 Fax: +61 8 9380 1014 The University of Western Australia (CRICOS Provider No 00126G) 35 Stirling Highway Crawley WA 6009 mailto:paul at physics.uwa.edu.au AUSTRALIA http://physics.uwa.edu.au/~paul
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: loading packages
- From: Murray Eisenberg <murray@math.umass.edu>
- Re: Re: loading packages