|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Conclusion: Mathematica will output plain text
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg39880] Re: [mg39853] Conclusion: Mathematica will output plain text
- From: Dr Bob <drbob at bigfoot.com>
- Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 05:30:43 -0500 (EST)
- References: <BA8FACD6.3155%carlos@titan.colorado.edu>
- Reply-to: drbob at bigfoot.com
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
It's dumb to have ANY undocumented functions in the default package load.
Part of the problem is that the help browser is only a keyword index, not a
search tool.
Bobby
On Sat, 08 Mar 2003 14:21:10 -0700, Carlos Felippa
<carlos at titan.Colorado.EDU> wrote:
> on 3/8/03 1:20 PM, Dr Bob at drbob at bigfoot.com wrote:
>
>> TextForm is undocumented, and that really seems dumb.
>>
> Yes, a pity because at least for me it seems useful. Sometimes
> one wants to connect output of Mathematica with downstream codes, without
> any superfluous formatting characters. That's the Unix approach.
>
>> Sometimes I get around the THOUSANDS of keywords missing from the
>> installed
>> help files by searching at the online Documentation Center --- but that
>> doesn't help with TextForm. There are no articles about it.
>>
>> However, a search of the MathGroup archives yields 20 matches, some of
>> which should be useful.
>>
>> You can't search for it unless you already know its name, of course.
>>
>> Bobby
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 02:52:27 -0500 (EST), Carlos Felippa
>
>
--
majort at cox-internet.com
Bobby R. Treat
Prev by Date:
RE: Symbols and Lists
Next by Date:
Re: Conclusion: Mathematica will output plain text
Previous by thread:
Re: Conclusion: Mathematica will output plain text
Next by thread:
Re: Conclusion: Mathematica will output plain text
|