Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2003
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2003

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Right-click'd BMP vs. exported BMP

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg39952] Re: Right-click'd BMP vs. exported BMP
  • From: Bill Rowe <listuser at earthlink.net>
  • Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 03:00:59 -0500 (EST)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

On 3/12/03 at 2:28 AM, lwalker701 at earthlink.net (Lawrence A. Walker
Jr.) wrote:

>I am running v. 4.2.  I like the way the graphics that I right-click'd
>and copied as bitmap appear in my Word documents.  However, I have a
>bunch of graphics that I needed copied that right-clicking gets to be
>tedious.

>But when I tried using the Export function, the bitmap graphic looks
>grainy and choppy when I imported the graphic into Word.  Also, the
>exported graphic file size seems to be noticeably large.

>Does anyone know how I can make the exported bitmap graphics look the
>same way as the right-click'd bitmap graphic.

Export the graphic in theMicrosoft windows metafile format. Microsoft apps such as Word and PowerPoint have no problem importing this format. Since this format isn't a bit mapped format, the graphic will be re-sizable in the Microsoft app without the grainy, choppy appearance.


  • Prev by Date: Re: What's legit here?
  • Next by Date: Running Mathematica in Kernel mode (UNIX)
  • Previous by thread: Re: Right-click'd BMP vs. exported BMP
  • Next by thread: Re: Right-click'd BMP vs. exported BMP