RE: Functions with multiple groups of arguments? [David Park?]

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg40039] RE: [mg40031] Functions with multiple groups of arguments? [David Park?]*From*: "David Park" <djmp at earthlink.net>*Date*: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 03:33:12 -0500 (EST)*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Tony, I picked up that form from reading Alfred Gray's Modern Differential Geometry book. For example, he writes the parametrization of a general ellipse as ellipse[a_, b_][t_] := {a Cos[t], b Sin[t]} This separates the "parametrization" variable t from the shape parameters a and b. To me, this is conceptually valuable, but there is also a Mathematica advantage. We can easily calculate the velocity of a point on the curve using the prime notation. ellipse[a, b]'[t] {-a Sin[t], b Cos[t]} In other words, ellipse[a,b] is a function name. If instead we had used the definition... ellipse2[a_, b_, t_] := {a Cos[t], b Sin[t]} we would have to use the more complicated statement D[ellipse2[a, b, t], t] {-a Sin[t], b Cos[t]} or Derivative[0, 0, 1][ellipse2][a, b, t] {-a Sin[t], b Cos[t]} to obtain the velocity. Asking for more information on ellipse, we have ?? ellipse Global`ellipse ellipse[a_,b_][t_]:={a Cos[t], b Sin[t]} but where is this stored? It's stored in... SubValues[ellipse] {HoldPattern[ellipse[a_, b_][t_]] :> {a Cos[t], b Sin[t]}} David Park djmp at earthlink.net http://home.earthlink.net/~djmp/ From: AES/newspost [mailto:siegman at stanford.edu] To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net In a recent message on Mathematica programming, David Park included a sample function definition in a form I've never encountered before, namely f[a_,b_,c_][x_] := a + Sin[b x + c] What is this? How does it work? (I can guess, but don't seem to find anything about this in the Help files to confirm my guess) Given the same values of a, b, c and x, does this form work differently in *any* way from f[a_,b_,c_, x_] := a + Sin[b x + c] If not, why do it this way? Or is the only reason for doing it this way one of cosmetics? ??? -- "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts absolutely." Lord Acton (1834-1902) "Dependence on advertising tends to corrupt. Total dependence on advertising corrupts totally." (today's equivalent)