Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2003
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2003

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Comparison of Mathematica on Various Computers

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg40044] Comparison of Mathematica on Various Computers
  • From: karl unterkofler <karl.unterkofler at fh-vorarlberg.ac.at>
  • Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 03:33:42 -0500 (EST)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

  ''Comparison of Mathematica on Various Computers''
is now on <a href="http://smc.vnet.net/mathbench.html";>
(or <a href="http://www2.staff.fh-vorarlberg.ac.at/~ku/karl/mma.html";>)


If you don't have access to the Web send e-mail to
karl at itp.tu-graz.ac.at for the latest version.

Mathematica 4.0 benchmark on http://www2.staff.fh-vorarlberg.ac.at/~ku/karl/timings40.html

  New results Mathematica 4.0:

Power Macintosh G4, 400 MHz, 1GB RAM, MacOS 9.0.2 
ASUS TerminatorP4, Pentium4, 1.7GHz, 512MB RAM, Win2000Pro 
Dual Athlon XP 1900 at 1.6 GHz, 512 Mo DDR SDRAM, SuSE Linux 7.3 SMP 
Dell Workstation, Pentium 4, 2.8 GHz,  2 GB RAM, Windows XP Pro 
PowerBook G4, 1 GHz,  1 GB RAM, OS X 10.2.4 
Mac Dual G4 800 MHz, 1 GB Ram, Mac OS X 10.2.3 
Pentium 4, 2.4GHz, 512MB cache, 1GB,  SuSE Linux 8.1 
Intel P4, 3.06 GHz, 512K L2 cache, 512MB DDR400,  Mandrake 9.0  kernel 2.4.19-smp 
Intel Pentium 4, 2.764Ghz, DDR Ram 512 MB,  Mandrake Linux 9.0 
PowerBook G4, 1 GHz,  1 GB RAM, OS X 10.2.4 
PowerBook G4, 550MHz, 512MB, OS X 10.1.5 
P4-B @ 3.06 Ghz, 4 Go 266 Mhz  RAM, Linux 2.4.20 
P4-B @ 3.06 Ghz, 4 Go 266 Mhz  RAM, Windows 2000 
P4-B @ 3.06 Ghz, 4 Go 266 Mhz  RAM, Windows 2003 .NET RC2  



  • Prev by Date: Re: Functions with multiple groups of arguments? [David Park?]
  • Next by Date: Re: Odd memory behavior, and uncontrollable memory growth
  • Previous by thread: Re: Increase in efficiency with Module
  • Next by thread: Q: lists