[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: DSOLVE in 5.01 ??
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg47642] Re: DSOLVE in 5.01 ??
*From*: turbo cyx <turbocyx at gmx.net>
*Date*: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 03:18:46 -0400 (EDT)
*References*: <c5j82s$r3h$1@smc.vnet.net> <c5oaui$1fl$1@smc.vnet.net> <c5qj6n$fvp$1@smc.vnet.net> <c5ten8$hum$1@smc.vnet.net>
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
So its since 4.1, does this change anything??
and no, I am not steve_H
Cu
Cyx
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 08:36:56 +0000 (UTC), "Peter Pein"
<petsie at arcor.de> wrote:
>"turbo cyx" <turbocyx at gmx.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>news:c5qj6n$fvp$1 at smc.vnet.net...
>> Why should I bother with this?? I am not willing to use workarounds
>> for Wolfram bugs (I am coauthor of a widely used courseware in
>> austria. Now I have to write this workaround for all the Lessons wich
>> use DSolve and boundary conditions, in a few month when 6.0 finally is
>> available I can undo this again ....)
>> Mathematica 4.2 (and all previous version) has been able to solve this
>system,
>> so I think 5.01 should be also (BTW: 6.0 Alpha can solve this system
>> again)
>> Wolfram where is a bugfix
>> Cyx
>>
>Mathematica 4.0 must have been published after vers. 4.2:
>
>In[1]:=
>$Version
>dgl1 = m*g - c*v[t]^2 == m*Derivative[1][v][t];
>dgl2 = Derivative[1][s][t] == -v[t];
>DSolve[{dgl1, dgl2, s[0] == h0, v[0] == 0}, {s[t], v[t]}, t]
>Out[1]=
>4.0 for Microsoft Windows (July 16, 1999)
>From In[1]:=
>Solve::incnst:
> Inconsistent or redundant transcendental equation. After
> Sqrt[g] Sqrt[m] C[2] 2
> reduction, the bad equation is 1 - Cosh[--------------------]
> Sqrt[c]
> == 0.
>From In[1]:=
>Solve::incnst:
> Inconsistent or redundant transcendental equation. After
> Sqrt[g] Sqrt[m] C[2] 2
> reduction, the bad equation is 1 - Cosh[--------------------]
> Sqrt[c]
> == 0.
>From In[1]:=
>Solve::tdep: The equations appear to involve the variables to be
> solved for in an essentially non-algebraic way.
>From In[1]:=
>DSolve::dsing:
> Unable to fit initial/boundary conditions {s[0] == h0, v[0] == 0}
> .
>Out[4]=
>{}
>In[5]:=
>DSolve[{dgl1,v[0]==0},v[t],t]
>Out[5]=
> Sqrt[c] Sqrt[g] t
> Sqrt[g] Sqrt[m] Tanh[-----------------]
> Sqrt[m]
>{{v[t] -> ---------------------------------------}}
> Sqrt[c]
>In[6]:=
>Integrate[-v[t]/.%[[1]],{t,0,z}]+h0
>Out[6]=
> Sqrt[c] Sqrt[g] z
> m Log[Cosh[-----------------]]
> Sqrt[m]
>h0 - ------------------------------
> c
>
>please check your statements _before_ posting (b.t.w. are you known as
>steve_H in sci.math.symbolic?).
>
>Thanks
Prev by Date:
**RE: Incidence/frequency of numbers in lists**
Next by Date:
**Re: Kernel crash?**
Previous by thread:
**Re: DSOLVE in 5.01 ??**
Next by thread:
**Solvability sensitive to small changes in numerical input**
| |