|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: NIntegrate or For or Special Function?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg47717] Re: NIntegrate or For or Special Function?
- From: "Alan" <info at optioncity.REMOVETHIS.net>
- Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 02:30:46 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <c67qg0$h0a$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
"Matt Swingle" <mss4 at duke.edu> wrote in message
news:c67qg0$h0a$1 at smc.vnet.net...
> I am constructing filling entries in a matrix using For loops. The
> individual entries come from integrating Bessel, Hankel and Kelvin
> functions numerically with NIntegrate. A 100x100 matrix takes a few hours
> to run? Is my procedural way of doing things to blame? Is it the
> specialty functions (Bessel etc)? Is it simply NIntegrate? Would anyone
> be willing to look at my awful code?
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
It all sounds quite normal to me. At say 1 sec per integration,
it would take about 3 hrs to do 10000 of them.
Are you sure your matrix has that many
distinct entries or is there perhaps some structure you have
failed to exploit?
regards,
alan
Prev by Date:
Re: Trig identity oscillations
Next by Date:
Distinguishable From 1.0
Previous by thread:
Re: NIntegrate or For or Special Function?
Next by thread:
Re: NIntegrate or For or Special Function?
|