|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Distinguishable From 1.0
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg47720] Distinguishable From 1.0
- From: Harold.Noffke at wpafb.af.mil (Harold Noffke)
- Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 02:30:50 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
$Version "5.0 for Microsoft Windows [2000] (November 18, 2003)"
Distinguishable From 1.0
MathGroup:
According to MathBook documentation ...
"$MachineEpsilon gives the smallest machine-precision number which can
be added to 1.0 to give a result that is distinguishable from 1.0."
The results below suggest that becoming "... distinguishable from 1.0"
does not occur until slightly under 1.5 * $MachineEpsilon.
Is there a misstatement here, or am I misunderstanding something about
being "... distinguishable from 1.0"?
In[1]:= 1. + 1.0 * $MachineEpsilon === 1.
Out[1]= True
In[2]:= 1. + 1.1 * $MachineEpsilon === 1.
Out[2]= True
In[3]:= 1. + 1.2 * $MachineEpsilon === 1.
Out[3]= True
In[4]:= 1. + 1.3 * $MachineEpsilon === 1.
Out[4]= True
In[5]:= 1. + 1.4 * $MachineEpsilon === 1.
Out[5]= True
In[6]:= 1. + 1.5 * $MachineEpsilon === 1.
Out[6]= False
Regards,
Harold
Prev by Date:
Distinguishable From 1.0
Next by Date:
Re: NIntegrate or For or Special Function?
Previous by thread:
Re: Distinguishable From 1.0
Next by thread:
Re: Distinguishable From 1.0
|