MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Failure to Evaluate?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg49843] Re: [mg49842] Failure to Evaluate?
  • From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>
  • Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 10:46:19 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <200408030511.BAA00239@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

On 3 Aug 2004, at 07:11, Scott Guthery wrote:
>
> f:=Function[#1^2/#1+1]
>
> g:=Function[#1^4+7]
>
> h:=D[f]/D[g]
>
> h[1]
>
> Gives
>
> ((#1^2/#1)+1 &)/(#1^4+7 &)[1]
>
> Why doesn't it evaluate by setting #1 to 1 to get 1/4?
>
> h/.#1->1//N sets #1 to 1 and gives
>
> (1 1 + 1 &)/(1 + 7 &)
>
> but still doesn't evaluate to 1/4.
>
> What gives? What's the Right Stuff?
>
> Thanks for any insight.
>
> Cheers, Scott
>
>
Mathematica does not implement the algebra of functions so if f an g 
are a functions, f+g, f*g, and f/g are not. Also, your definition,
f=Function[#1^2/#1+1] seems pointless, since this is just 
Function[#1+1]. Did you mean f=Function[#1^2/(#1+1)]? In addition, 
there is no point using delayed evaluation in the definitions of f, g 
and h; the only thing it does is make you code slightly slower. And 
another thing: what do you think D[f] and D[g] are? Well, whatever you 
intended they just return f and g. Presumably what you meant was f' and 
g' (Derivative[1][f],Derivative[1][g])?

Anyway,  there are two ways to deal with this. One is to unprotected 
Plus, Times, and Power and overload them to work with functions. I 
showed how to do this in this list several years ago but it is pretty 
obvious so I do not want to repeat it. Besides, I do not recommend this 
approach. A simpler way is simply this:


f = #1 + 1 & ;


g = #1^4 + 7 & ;


h = Function[x, Derivative[1][f][x]/Derivative[1][g][x]];


h[1]


1/4


Andrzej Kozlowski
Chiba, Japan
http://www.mimuw.edu.pl/~akoz/


  • Prev by Date: 'NonlinearFit` confusion
  • Next by Date: Re: integral question
  • Previous by thread: Re: Failure to Evaluate?
  • Next by thread: Re: Failure to Evaluate?