Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2004
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: ReadListBinary question

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg49885] Re: ReadListBinary question
  • From: Jonathan Greenberg <greenberg at ucdavis.edu>
  • Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 09:20:59 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <cequ9f$k24$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Thanks for the responses! -- I found the quickest way was to include
"Evaluate[nval]" in the call, which seemed to work well.

--j


On 8/4/04 8:10 AM, in article cequ9f$k24$1 at smc.vnet.net, "Jonathan
Greenberg" <greenberg at ucdavis.edu> wrote:

> Is there any reason why ReadListBinary[stream,type,n] doesn't let me use a
> variable for "n" (e.g. If I set nval=5, and ReadListBinary[stream,type,nval]
> -- it won't work)?  Are there any workarounds for this?
> 
> --j
> 


  • Prev by Date: Re: Select from a list
  • Next by Date: Re: Forcing Argument Evaluation
  • Previous by thread: Re: ReadListBinary question
  • Next by thread: Re: ReadListBinary question