[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: identity matrix
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg49961] Re: identity matrix
*From*: Bill Rowe <readnewsciv at earthlink.net>
*Date*: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 03:52:25 -0400 (EDT)
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
On 8/6/04 at 3:09 AM, markbishop at charter.net (Mark) wrote:
>Is the identity matrix strictly a matrix with 1's along the
>principal diagonal (and zeros elsewhere),
Yes.
>or is a matrix which reduces (through row and column operations) to
>the above form also the identity matrix.
No.
To see why this is true consider the value of the first element in a matrix multiplication
That would be Sum[A[[1,j]] I[[1,j]] {j,1,m}] where m is the number of columns. The obvious way to make this Sum be A[[1,1]] is for I[[1,1]] = 1 and I[[1,j]]= 0 for all j != 1. When you add the constraint that each element of the result must match the corresponding element of A, it is easy to see I must have 1's in the diagonal and 0's everywhere else. Any other choice would mean A would not equal A I which by definition means I would not be the identity matrix.
--
To reply via email subtract one hundred and four
Prev by Date:
**Turing machines anyone?**
Next by Date:
**Another question about Compile[]:**
Previous by thread:
**Re: identity matrix**
Next by thread:
**Re: How to creat this 8×8 images**
| |