Re: Beware of NSolve
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg50176] Re: [mg50165] Beware of NSolve
- From: Bob Hanlon <hanlonr at cox.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 06:28:05 -0400 (EDT)
- Reply-to: hanlonr at cox.net
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Same results with version 5.0.1 on a Mac; however, using higher precision corrected this: NSolve[f==0,x,WorkingPrecision->35] { {x -> -0.014126116704662366388244906316568330018795496579`3\ 4.69897000433602}, {x -> 0.00281659289513855686443538250704452049498597276\ 8`34.69897000433602}} Bob Hanlon > > From: carlos at colorado.edu (Carlos Felippa) To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net > Date: 2004/08/18 Wed AM 01:20:19 EDT > To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net > Subject: [mg50176] [mg50165] Beware of NSolve > > Run v. 4.2 on Mac: > > f=5/432 - 11/(27*Sqrt[70]*Sqrt[19 - 1890*x]) + x/(2*Sqrt[38/35 - 108*x]); > > Solve[f==0,x] returns 2 real roots: > > {{x -> (-171 - 25*Sqrt[105])/30240}, {x -> (-171 + 25*Sqrt[105])/30240}} > > NSolve[f==0,x] returns 4 real roots: > > {{x -> -0.10481082961146104}, {x -> -0.014126116704662378}, > {x -> 0.002816592895138556}, {x -> 0.0003796126802330315}} > > Roots 1 and 4 are incorrect. (Just plot f) > > Had a similar problem with a quartic 3 months ago. This is a > simpler example. > >
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Beware of NSolve
- From: "Janos D. Pinter" <jdpinter@hfx.eastlink.ca>
- Re: Re: Beware of NSolve