[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: functions
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg45573] Re: functions
*From*: Bill Rowe <readnewsciv at earthlink.net>
*Date*: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:26:32 -0500 (EST)
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
On 1/13/04 at 4:04 AM, Harold.Noffke at wpafb.af.mil (Harold Noffke) wrote:
> I think a "better answer" can be had by examining Mathematica 5.0's
> ability to remain error free when confronted with cleverly constructed
> known irrational expressions, such as the one below, copied from the
> Built-In Functions reference for Rationals
> In[1]:= Element[3^(Sqrt[5]), Rationals]
> Out[1]= False
This appears to be no better than the other answers since
Elements[3^Sqrt[4.], Rationals]
False
while
Elements[3^Sqrt[4],Rationals]
True
Clearly, any computer system can only represent irrational numbers as a finite string of digits or as a special symbol. It should be equally clear any finite set of digits can be written as the ratio of two integers. So, the only distinction between a finite set of digits intended to represent an irrational number and a rational number is intent. Since there is currently no way for Mathematica to determine your intent, it seems clear any proceedure to restrict a function to rational numbers can only work if the rational numbers are not given in decimal form.
--
To reply via email subtract one hundred and four
Prev by Date:
**Re: Symplectic integration and Interpolating function**
Next by Date:
**Re: List arguments to functions**
Previous by thread:
**Re: functions**
Next by thread:
**Graphics / cosmetics**
| |