[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: ArcCos[x] with x > 1
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg49347] Re: ArcCos[x] with x > 1
*From*: ab_def at prontomail.com (Maxim)
*Date*: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 07:00:12 -0400 (EDT)
*References*: <cclev9$kb3$1@smc.vnet.net> <cco3io$4ig$1@smc.vnet.net> <cctaff$c11$1@smc.vnet.net> <cd0730$9g9$1@smc.vnet.net>
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
"David W. Cantrell" <DWCantrell at sigmaxi.org> wrote in message news:<cd0730$9g9$1 at smc.vnet.net>...
> But Paul's case is for version 5, as is what I showed above. So at least
> in the current version, some indefinite integrals are wrong.
Actually this is a quite curious example, because Mathematica 5.0
doesn't always return the same answer for this integral:
In[1]:=
indef1 = Integrate[r*Sqrt[4*r^2+1]*ArcCos[1/(2*r)], r]
def1 = Integrate[r*Sqrt[4*r^2+1]*ArcCos[1/(2*r)], {r, 1/2, 1/Sqrt[2]}]
Integrate[Sqrt[4*r^2+1]*ArcCos[1/(2*r)], r]
indef2 = Integrate[r*Sqrt[4*r^2+1]*ArcCos[1/(2*r)], r]
def2 = Integrate[r*Sqrt[4*r^2+1]*ArcCos[1/(2*r)], {r, 1/2, 1/Sqrt[2]}]
Out[1]=
(1/24)*Sqrt[1 + 4*r^2]*((-Sqrt[4 - 1/r^2])*r + (2 +
8*r^2)*ArcCos[1/(2*r)]) -
(r*((-4 + Sqrt[16 - 1/r^4])*(-1 + 16*r^4) + 2*Sqrt[16 -
1/r^4]*Sqrt[-1 + 16*r^4]*
Log[4*r^2 + Sqrt[-1 + 16*r^4]]))/(24*Sqrt[4 + 1/r^2]*(-1 +
4*r^2)*Sqrt[1 + 4*r^2])
Out[2]=
(1/48)*(2 - 4*Sqrt[3] + 3*Sqrt[3]*Pi - 4*Log[2 + Sqrt[3]])
Out[3]=
Integrate[Sqrt[4*r^2+1]*ArcCos[1/(2*r)], r]
Out[4]=
(1/24)*Sqrt[1 + 4*r^2]*((-Sqrt[4 - 1/r^2])*r + (2 +
8*r^2)*ArcCos[1/(2*r)]) +
(Sqrt[4 - 1/r^2]*r*Sqrt[-1 + 16*r^4]*(ArcTan[1/Sqrt[-1 + 16*r^4]] -
2*Log[4*r^2 + Sqrt[-1 + 16*r^4]]))/
(24*(-1 + 4*r^2)*Sqrt[1 + 4*r^2])
Out[5]=
(1/144)*((-2 + 9*Sqrt[3])*Pi - 6*(Sqrt[3] + Log[7 + 4*Sqrt[3]]))
This quirk is 100% reproducible on my machine (except for one time
when it crashed the kernel); apparently, evaluating In[3] changes some
internal states/settings and indef2, def2 are not the same as indef1,
def1. Out[4] and Out[5] are correct while Out[1] and Out[2] are not.
Similar things sometimes occur after a computation is interrupted, and
this is probably one of the most annoying and hard to track types of
glitches; here's an example where it is easy to see what is going on:
In[1]:=
Options[Series]
Sum[D[Pochhammer[1,k]^2/Pochhammer[n,k]*2^-k/k!, n], {k, 0, Infinity}]
(*interrupt the computation with Alt-.*)
Options[Series]
Out[1]=
{Analytic -> True}
Infinity::indet: Indeterminate expression 0*n*Infinity*Gamma[n]
encountered.
Infinity::indet: Indeterminate expression 0*Infinity*Gamma[1 + n]
encountered.
Infinity::indet: Indeterminate expression 0*n*Infinity*Gamma[n]
encountered.
General::stop: Further output of Infinity::indet will be suppressed
during this calculation.
Out[2]=
$Aborted
Out[3]=
{Analytic -> False}
If you press Alt-. after you see the warning messages, Mathematica
forgets to restore the previous setting for Analytic.
Maxim Rytin
m.r at inbox.ru
Prev by Date:
**Re: User-defined or filled symbols for Points in ListPlots and Epilogs?**
Next by Date:
**Re: Mathematica 5 I/O memory issues.**
Previous by thread:
**Re: ArcCos[x] with x > 1**
Next by thread:
**Re: ArcCos[x] with x > 1**
| |