Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2004
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Differences in Random Numbers

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg46784] Differences in Random Numbers
  • From: Mark Coleman <mark at markscoleman.com>
  • Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 04:10:19 -0500 (EST)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Greetings,

My understanding is that the built-in Mathematica command Random[ ] will 
produce a uniformly distributed pseudo-random number in the range 0 to 
1. Based on my read of the documentation, this should be equivalent to 
calling Random[UniformDistribution[0,1]] (after loading 
Statistics`ContinuousDistributions of course)). Is this correct?

I ask this question because of some unusual results I obtained while 
testing another (fairly complex) program that makes use of uniform 
random variates. I initially used the Random[UniformDistribution[0,1]] 
function call and obtained final results of the complex program that 
were quire a bit different from the test case that I have been using to 
verify my code. When I switched to the simple Random[ ] call, my 
results looked much better. Sorry if this seems vague, but I found this 
behavior somewhat anomalous and wanted to be sure I understood the 
differences, in any, between these two methods of generating random 
variates.

Thanks,

-Mark


  • Prev by Date: Re: Shared variables between notebooks?
  • Next by Date: Re: Playing multiple sounds in sequence
  • Previous by thread: Re: Shared variables between notebooks?
  • Next by thread: Re: Differences in Random Numbers