MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Differences in Random Numbers

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg46813] Re: Differences in Random Numbers
  • From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 04:30:59 -0500 (EST)
  • Organization: Universitaet Leipzig
  • References: <c2hdhe$abi$>
  • Reply-to: kuska at
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at

Mark Coleman wrote:
> Greetings,
> My understanding is that the built-in Mathematica command Random[ ] will
> produce a uniformly distributed pseudo-random number in the range 0 to
> 1. Based on my read of the documentation, this should be equivalent to
> calling Random[UniformDistribution[0,1]] (after loading
> Statistics`ContinuousDistributions of course)). Is this correct?

The source code say

UniformDistribution/: Random[UniformDistribution[min_:0, max_:1]] :=
		Random[Real, {min, max}]

> I ask this question because of some unusual results I obtained while
> testing another (fairly complex) program that makes use of uniform
> random variates. I initially used the Random[UniformDistribution[0,1]]
> function call and obtained final results of the complex program that
> were quire a bit different from the test case that I have been using to
> verify my code. When I switched to the simple Random[ ] call, my
> results looked much better. Sorry if this seems vague, but I found this
> behavior somewhat anomalous and wanted to be sure I understood the
> differences, in any, between these two methods of generating random
> variates.

Just try it out

Table[Random[], {10}]


Table[Random[UniformDistribution[0, 1]], {10}]

will produce the same list.


  • Prev by Date: Re: Playing multiple sounds in sequence
  • Next by Date: Re: ReplaceList -- Unexpected Answer
  • Previous by thread: Re: Differences in Random Numbers
  • Next by thread: ND Solver problem