Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
MathGroup Archive
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Mean

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg48174] Re: Mean
  • From: spam at husumtoften.invalid (Per Rønne)
  • Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 03:56:33 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <c83t48$mbc$>
  • Reply-to: spam at (Per Rønne)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at

Bill Rowe <readnewsciv at> wrote:

>But since Mean is a protected symbol built into the kernel starting
>with version 5.0 of Mathematica, I would not expect Mathematica to
>return an unevaluated result unless you intentionally unprotected Mean
>and created a new definition.
> If you cut and paste
> Mean[{4.7, 7.2, 8.4, 5.8, 9.2, 3.9}]
>from this email into a fresh Mathematica expression then evaluate it
>using shift-return do you get the correct result? If the answer is yes,
>then there must have been something you did earlier to cause
>Mathematica not to evaluate Mean.
$Version returns

4.2 for Mac OS X (October 20, 2002)

- which explains everything [except one obsolete book and one book which
is "too new"].
Per Erik Rønne

  • Prev by Date: Re: reviving mathematica afte update to SuSE Linux 9.1
  • Next by Date: Re: Simple, syntactical question
  • Previous by thread: Re: Mean
  • Next by thread: Re: Mean