Re: Re: New version, new bugs
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg51780] Re: [mg42582] Re: New version, new bugs
- From: DrBob <drbob at bigfoot.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 02:54:09 -0500 (EST)
- References: <200307170745.DAA22964@smc.vnet.net> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Reply-to: drbob at bigfoot.com
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
This was fixed in version 5.0, but it's broken again in 5.0.1:
InputForm[%, NumberMarks -> False]
We're supposed to see 20 digits in the last output, according to the Book, section 3.1.4.
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:23:18 -0500, Dr Bob <drbob at bigfoot.com> wrote:
> In version 5:
> But I agree the bug-reporting and repair process is broken.
> It needs to be much more transparent -- if what we think and feel countsfor anything.
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 03:45:03 -0400 (EDT), Ersek, Ted R<ErsekTR at navair.navy.mil> wrote:
>> In response to some reported bugs Andrzej Kozlowski wrote:
>> I agree that the other bugs you mention are awful and ought to have been
>> fixed long ago. Some of them at least seem pretty trivial to fix and it
>> seems that the only reason why they haven't been fixed is that they were
>> never recorded on a "to be done" list. I feel that something is seriously
>> amiss when a reported bug that does not require a major re-write of the
>> kernel is not fixed: at least the person who reported it ought to begiven
>> an explanation why it has not been done. It looks to me that Wolfram's
>> entire bug-reporting system needs a serious reconsideration. -------------
>> The Wolfram Research process for testing and fixing bugs is badly brokenat
>> Wolfram Research. For more evidence of this consider the following. The
>> Mathematica Book (4th edition) section 3.1.4 gives the following on page
>> Out= 3.1415926535897932385
>> Out//InputForm = 3.141592653589793238462643383279503`20
>> In:= InputForm[%,NumberMarks->False]
>> Out//InputForm = 3.1415926535897932385
>> I am using Mathematica 4.1 under Windows 98, and I get Out//InputForm= InputForm[3.141592653589793238462643383279503`20, NumberMarks -> False]
>> from the last line above.
>> Someone at Wolfram said this probably works on the platform that was usedto
>> make The Mathematica Book. I reported this problem several months before
>> version 4.0 was released, and it still wasn't fixed even in version 4.1. I
>> don't know if it works in version 4.2 or 5.0, but I wouldn't bet on it.
>> Shouldn't they be embarrassed that some versions of Mathematica can't do
>> something that is demonstrated in The Mathematica Book? I can't believe
>> fixing this would require a great deal of effort, and I find it appalling
>> that they can't be bothered to fix it.
>> Ted Ersek
DrBob at bigfoot.com
Prev by Date:
Re: newbie question on functions
Next by Date:
Re: bimodal ditribution form counting signs of Pi digits differences
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Re: Zero divided by a number...
Next by thread: