Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2004
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: TraditionalForm of expressions WITHOUT evaluating.

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg52179] Re: [mg52158] TraditionalForm of expressions WITHOUT evaluating.
  • From: Bob Hanlon <hanlonr at cox.net>
  • Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 04:30:15 -0500 (EST)
  • Reply-to: hanlonr at cox.net
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

If your Default Output FormatType is TraditionalForm then you can use

Integrate[x,{x,2,3}]//HoldForm

Otherwise use

Integrate[x,{x,2,3}]//TraditionalForm//HoldForm


Bob Hanlon

> 
> From: ncc1701zzz at hotmail.com (Nacho)
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
> Date: 2004/11/13 Sat AM 04:40:06 EST
> To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
> Subject: [mg52179] [mg52158] TraditionalForm of expressions WITHOUT evaluating.
> 
> Hello.
> 
> I would like to ask you how to do the following.
> 
> I want to input some expressions (in InputForm or StandardForm) and
> display them in TraditionalForm but without evaluating them.
> 
> For example, if I do:
> 
> 2+2 == 4 // TraditionalForm
> 
> I obtain "True" in a nice font ;) but not the "2+2 = 4".
> 
> The expression I want to do is more complicated, with integrals, but
> basicly it is the same, for example:
> 
> Integrate[x,{x,2,3}] //TraditionalForm
> 
> Returns 5/2, but I want the Integral symbol with the limits and the
> dx.
> 
> 
> 
> Also, related to this, anybody knowns how to export a graphic, cell,
> or Traditionalform expression to a bitmap with the resulution I want
> and smoothed? For example, a 1024x768 graph with the lines smoothed,
> or an integral with smoothed font in a resolution to be included in a
> image.
> 
> Thanks a lot for your answers.
> 
> Best regards.
> 
> 


  • Prev by Date: Re: Matrix Dot Product
  • Next by Date: Re: TraditionalForm of expressions WITHOUT evaluating.
  • Previous by thread: Re: TraditionalForm of expressions WITHOUT evaluating.
  • Next by thread: Re: TraditionalForm of expressions WITHOUT evaluating.