Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2004
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re : Principal Value integral

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg52373] Re : [mg52361] Principal Value integral
  • From: "Jaccard Florian" <Florian.Jaccard at he-arc.ch>
  • Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 05:49:44 -0500 (EST)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Hello Carlo,

I obtain the correct answer with 5.0 !
What version do you use?

In fact, we always should be very prudent using Integrate, because there are still a lot of bugs. Just look in the archive!
A good thing is always to check that NIntegrate gives the same numerical value!

Regards
 
F.Jaccard


-----Message d'origine-----
De : Carlo Teubner [mailto:AskMeAndIllTellYou. at example.com] 
Envoyé : mercredi, 24. novembre 2004 08:33
À : mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
Objet : [mg52361] Principal Value integral

The following Principal Value integral does not appear to give the 
correct result.

Integrate[1/(x^3-1), {x, -Infinity, Infinity}, PrincipalValue->True]

This gives I Pi / 3, which surely can't be right since the answer should 
be real.

When doing it numerically, it gives the right answer:

<<NumericalMath`CauchyPrincipalValue`
CauchyPrincipalValue[1/(x^3-1), {z, -Infinity, {1}, Infinity}]

This gives -1.8138 which is the correct answer (it's -Pi/Sqrt[3]).

Any explanations? Is this a bug or am I missing something?

Carlo



  • Prev by Date: Re: Principal Value integral
  • Next by Date: Re: Integral: Exp[-(x-m)^2/(2 s^2)] x^3 (1+x^2)^-1
  • Previous by thread: Re: Using the same symbol for different quantities
  • Next by thread: tetrahedral Siegel Disk Julia map