|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Newly Released Mathematica 5.1 Delivers Unmatched Performance for Handling Data
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg52408] Re: [mg52396] Re: Re: Re: Newly Released Mathematica 5.1 Delivers Unmatched Performance for Handling Data
- From: "David Park" <djmp at earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 01:04:38 -0500 (EST)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
John,
I was thinking of angular measurement. The following works...
Needs["Miscellaneous`Units`"]
Convert[(Pi/4)*Radian, °]
45 °
but the following, using an approximate value, does not work because Degree
immediately multiplies out undoing the conversion.
Convert[1.35 Radian, °]
1.35
The ExtendUnits package at my web site fixes this but at the expense of
putting a HoldForm on the degree symbol.
Needs["Miscellaneous`V4ExtendUnits`"]
1.35 Radian // ToUnit[°]
% // FullForm
77.3493 °
Times[77.34930234266115`, HoldForm[Degree]]
Since I generally consider value substitution and unit conversion as the
last step in a physical calculation this is not a huge problem. Still it
would be nice if units and numerical constants had different names.
David Park
djmp at earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~djmp/
From: John Jowett [mailto:John.Jowett at cern.ch]
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
I'm not sure that it is necessary to have a unit Degree as Kelvin is already
there and is used, e.g., in the definition of BoltzmannConstant. The
Miscellaneous`Units` has a special handling of temperature scales
(ConvertTemperature) that are not proportional to each other like other
units. It seems a bit clumsy but I don't have much occasion to use it
myself. Otherwise
Convert[5 Fahrenheit, Kelvin]
returns something that might be considered reasonable, with a warning
message.
"David Park" <djmp at earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:co1ejp$shb$1 at smc.vnet.net...
> John,
>
> Your idea about non-conflicting color names seems good. Also there should
be
> a unit Degree and a different name for the numerical constant.
>
Prev by Date:
Re: Re: Newly Released Mathematica 5.1 Delivers Unmatched Performance for Handling Data
Next by Date:
Re: convolution vs. NMinimize
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Re: Newly Released Mathematica 5.1 Delivers Unmatched Performance for Handling Data
Next by thread:
Re: Newly Released Mathematica 5.1 Delivers Unmatched Performance for Handling Data
|