MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Boolean Type


You've got it right in the Real case, although you might want

   f[x_?NumericQ]

instead. If by 'boolean variable' you mean one that has values in 
{True, False}, then this will do the trick:

   f[x_?(MemberQ[{True, False}, #] &)]


-----
Selwyn Hollis
http://www.appliedsymbols.com
(edit reply-to to reply)


On Nov 26, 2004, at 1:04 AM, JMyers6761 wrote:

> All,
> 	I would like to define a function wich would work (in different ways) 
> for both
> real and boolean input argruments. How should I best implement a 
> function which
> would implement the following intent?
>
> func[x_Real]:= some function involving a real varialble x
>
> func[x_Boolean]:= some function involving a boolean variable x
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
> Al Myers
>
>
>
>


  • Prev by Date: Re: Separating constants from nonconstants in an expression
  • Next by Date: Re: Automatic numbered equations
  • Previous by thread: Re: Boolean Type
  • Next by thread: Re: Boolean Type