|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: 3D data set
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg51070] Re: 3D data set
- From: p-valko at tamu.edu (Peter Valko)
- Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 05:47:48 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <cjdq0q$ar3$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Hi,
First I would try a two-parameter minimization of
Sum[ (x- b Sin[a z])^2+(y - b Cos[a z])^2, go through points]
If it works, I would look up the "error-in-variables" methods that is
a generalization of the least squares method for the case when all
variables (x,y,z) are corrupted by errors.
Peter
Giovanni Bellesia <giovanni.bellesia at ucd.ie> wrote in message news:<cjdq0q$ar3$1 at smc.vnet.net>...
> Dear all,
>
> I have a general question regarding a topic which is not
> completely new to the forum.
> I have a 3D data set (from a Monte Carlo simulation) which are supposed
> to lay approximately on a helix.
> Does anybody knows a clear and efficient procedure to fit these points
> to a regular, circular helix.
> I read something about this in a message dated may 2004 by D.L. but I
> wasn't able to download the related files
>
> Thanks
>
> Giovanni
Prev by Date:
Re: Partial derivation with regards to variables in a list
Next by Date:
Re: Error with NDSolve
Previous by thread:
Re: 3D data set
Next by thread:
Re: 3D data set
|