[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Re: Re: Calculus : limits
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg51398] Re: [mg51366] Re: [mg51301] Re: [mg51279] Calculus : limits
*From*: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>
*Date*: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 04:20:30 -0400 (EDT)
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Yes, you are right. But, as I am sure Bobby Treat would agree ;-) , it
ought to be under Limit. The point is that unless you have a reason to
suspect that Limit by default computes directional limits it is
unlikely you will look under Direction to find out. But I have to agree
that I was wrong: the long ago made promise to put this into the
documentation was kept, even though, in my opinion, not in the most
natural way.
Andrzej
On 15 Oct 2004, at 15:46, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
> The documentation is there in the front end (at least in Mathematica
> 5.0.1), just not in The Mathematica Book:
>
> Options[Limit]
> {Analytic -> False, Assumptions :> $Assumptions, Direction ->
> Automatic}
>
> ?Direction
> Direction is an option for Limit. Limit[expr, x -> x0, Direction -> 1]
> computes the limit as x approaches x0 from smaller values. Limit[expr,
> x
> -> x0, Direction -> -1] computes the limit as x approaches x0 from
> larger values. Direction -> Automatic uses Direction -> -1 except for
> limits at Infinity, where it is equivalent to Direction -> 1.
>
>
> Andrzej Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 12 Oct 2004, at 14:57, Amir wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd like to find the limit of
>>> Limit[(Abs[Sin[x]-Sin[2 x]]) / x, x->0]
>>>
>>> I use Mathematica v.5. I get the wrong (??) answer : 1
>>>
>>> While I try to display the graph of this function by using "Plot", it
>>> seems that there is no limit at the point x=0.
>>> Please help...
>>>
>>> Amir
>>>
>>
>>
>> Mathematica's answer is correct but ... Limit always computes
>> directional limits. Thus:
>>
>>
>> Limit[Abs[Sin[x] - Sin[2*x]]/x, x -> 0, Direction -> -1]
>>
>> 1
>>
>> but
>>
>> Limit[Abs[Sin[x] - Sin[2*x]]/x, x -> 0, Direction -> 1]
>>
>> -1
>>
>> So the limits as x goes to 0 form above and form below are different
>> and thus "there is n limit'.
>>
>> Also, as you see by default Limit computes "from above". However, I
>> still can't find this clearly documented in version 5, even though I
>> remeber myself (and others) complaining about this lack of
>> documentation in version 4 (if not earlier).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Andrzej Kozlowski
>> Chiba, Japan
>> http://www.akikoz.net/~andrzej/
>> http://www.mimuw.edu.pl/~akoz/
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Murray Eisenberg murray at math.umass.edu
> Mathematics & Statistics Dept.
> Lederle Graduate Research Tower phone 413 549-1020 (H)
> University of Massachusetts 413 545-2859 (W)
> 710 North Pleasant Street fax 413 545-1801
> Amherst, MA 01003-9305
>
Prev by Date:
**Need code to calculate the Lower Envelope for a set of (non collinear) points.**
Next by Date:
**Re: PDE Notation options (one works the other does not)**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Re: Calculus : limits**
Next by thread:
**Re: Re: Re: Re: Calculus : limits**
| |