|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Re: Re: Sorting a list of pairs on the second elements
>> Both methods do the same thing at my machine,
>
> They should not when the data is actually made of Strings.
I copied from the e-mail, foolishly thinking the list was in usable InputForm.
Bobby
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:49:43 -0400 (EDT), Peltio <peltio at twilight.zone> wrote:
> "DrBob" wrote
>
>> Both methods do the same thing at my machine,
>
> They should not when the data is actually made of Strings.
>
> sss={{"ttcttgcctttgcgg","121"},...}
> and not symbols and integers as in
> sss={{ttcttgcctttgcgg,121},...}
>
>> and there's also a third method that may do better: [snip]
>> Reverse /@ Sort[Reverse /@ sss]
>
> I had already tried that one but it was slower than
>
> Transpose@Reverse@Transpose@Sort@Transpose@Reverse@Transpose[
> sss]
>
> Mapping Reverse on every row of a long list is more time consuming than
> tranposing the matrix and swapping its *two* long rows.
> This is the side effect of working with an interpreted language, I guess.
>
> cheers,
> Peltio
> Invalid address in reply-to. Crafty demunging required to mail me.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
DrBob at bigfoot.com
www.eclecticdreams.net
Prev by Date:
Re: Corrupted file
Next by Date:
Re: How to find out the transformation used in Mathematica
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Sorting a list of pairs on the second elements
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Sorting a list of pairs on the second elements
|
