|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: can't MATHEMATICA simplify simple expressions?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg51555] Re: can't MATHEMATICA simplify simple expressions?
- From: "Dana DeLouis" <delouis at bellsouth.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:22:26 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
I believe with square roots, there are usually two answers. For example,
here we see that the answer could be + - 2.
In[1]:=(a^2)^(3/2) /. a -> 2
Out[1]=8
In[2]:=(a^2)^(3/2) /. a -> -2
Out[2]=8
Two ideas.
In[3]:=
Assuming[a > 0, FullSimplify[(a^2)^(3/2)]]
Out[3]=a^3
In[4]:=
FullSimplify[(a^2)^(3/2), Assumptions -> a > 0]
Out[4]=a^3
HTH
--
Dana DeLouis
Win XP & Office 2003
"Cole Turner" <REMOVEcole.tuner at liwest.at> wrote in message
news:cl4tg0$8g7$1 at smc.vnet.net...
> if I enter:
>
> FullSimplify [ (a^2)^(3/2) ]
>
> (in correct MATHEMATICA syntax, the program does not yield the correct
> result, a^3 ...
>
> why is that?
>
> thanks!
> --
> Johnny: [plugging back in the runway lights]
> "Just kidding."
> ('Airplane!', 1980)
>
Prev by Date:
Re: can't MATHEMATICA simplify simple expressions?
Next by Date:
Re: conditionnal rule
Previous by thread:
Re: can't MATHEMATICA simplify simple expressions?
Next by thread:
conditionnal rule
|