|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Log[4]==2*Log[2]
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg50520] Log[4]==2*Log[2]
- From: Andreas Stahel <sha at hta-bi.bfh.ch>
- Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 05:17:32 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
To whom it may concern
the following answer of Mathematica 5.0 puzzeled me
Log[4]==2*Log[2]
leads to
N::meprec: Internal precision limit $MaxExtraPrecision = 50.` reached while \
evaluating -2\Log[2]+Log[4]
with the inputs given as answer. But the input
Log[4.0]==2*Log[2]
leads to a sound "True"
Simplify[Log[4]-2*Log[2]]
leads to the correct 0, but
Simplify[Log[4]-2*Log[2]==0]
yields no result
There must be some systematic behind thid surprising behaviour.
Could somebody give me a hint please
With best regards
Andreas
--
Andreas Stahel E-Mail: Andreas.Stahel at [ANTI-SPAM]hti.bfh.ch
Mathematics, HTI Phone: ++41 +32 32 16 258
Quellgasse 21 Fax: ++41 +32 321 500
CH-2501 Biel WWW: www.hta-bi.bfh.ch/~sha
Switzerland
Prev by Date:
Matrix calculation causes memory usage to jump
Next by Date:
Re: Can't get graph to display when using ImplicitPlot!
Previous by thread:
Matrix calculation causes memory usage to jump
Next by thread:
Re: Log[4]==2*Log[2]
|