Re: 3D graph with assumptions

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg50824] Re: 3D graph with assumptions*From*: Paul Abbott <paul at physics.uwa.edu.au>*Date*: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 04:52:02 -0400 (EDT)*Organization*: The University of Western Australia*References*: <ciqvj2$im4$1@smc.vnet.net>*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

In article <ciqvj2$im4$1 at smc.vnet.net>, mbekkali at gmail.com (Mukhtar) wrote: > Suppose I have f(x,y) that I need to Plot in 3D, however, the range of > x is (0,1) while the range of y is (0,g(x)), where g(x) is some > explicit function of x, say x^1/2. Is there a way to do it since > specifying it directly the way I outlined above in Plot3D gives me the > error message that "Plot3D :: plln: Limiting value g(x) in {y,0,g(x)} > is not a machine-size real number". Perhaps I can do this indirectly > by plotting two surfaces and then consider the relevant part of > surface f(x,y), however, it would look ugly. Thanks. > See http://groups.google.com/groups?threadm=694bal$km0 at smc.vnet.net Cheers, Paul -- Paul Abbott Phone: +61 8 6488 2734 School of Physics, M013 Fax: +61 8 6488 1014 The University of Western Australia (CRICOS Provider No 00126G) 35 Stirling Highway Crawley WA 6009 mailto:paul at physics.uwa.edu.au AUSTRALIA http://physics.uwa.edu.au/~paul