Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2004
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: 3D graph with assumptions

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg50824] Re: 3D graph with assumptions
  • From: Paul Abbott <paul at physics.uwa.edu.au>
  • Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 04:52:02 -0400 (EDT)
  • Organization: The University of Western Australia
  • References: <ciqvj2$im4$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

In article <ciqvj2$im4$1 at smc.vnet.net>, mbekkali at gmail.com (Mukhtar) 
wrote:

> Suppose I have f(x,y) that I need to Plot in 3D, however, the range of
> x is (0,1) while the range of y is (0,g(x)), where g(x) is some
> explicit function of x, say x^1/2.  Is there a way to do it since
> specifying it directly the way I outlined above in Plot3D gives me the
> error message that "Plot3D :: plln: Limiting value g(x) in {y,0,g(x)}
> is not a machine-size real number". Perhaps I can do this indirectly
> by plotting two surfaces and then consider the relevant part of
> surface f(x,y), however, it would look ugly. Thanks.
> 

See

 http://groups.google.com/groups?threadm=694bal$km0 at smc.vnet.net

Cheers,
Paul

-- 
Paul Abbott                                   Phone: +61 8 6488 2734
School of Physics, M013                         Fax: +61 8 6488 1014
The University of Western Australia      (CRICOS Provider No 00126G)         
35 Stirling Highway
Crawley WA 6009                      mailto:paul at physics.uwa.edu.au 
AUSTRALIA                            http://physics.uwa.edu.au/~paul


  • Prev by Date: Re: Telling Mathematica that a symbol is going to be a List?
  • Next by Date: Re: Telling Mathematica that a symbol is going to be a List?
  • Previous by thread: Re: 3D graph with assumptions
  • Next by thread: RE: 3D graph with assumptions