Re: 3D graph with assumptions
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg50824] Re: 3D graph with assumptions
- From: Paul Abbott <paul at physics.uwa.edu.au>
- Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 04:52:02 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: The University of Western Australia
- References: <ciqvj2$im4$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
In article <ciqvj2$im4$1 at smc.vnet.net>, mbekkali at gmail.com (Mukhtar)
wrote:
> Suppose I have f(x,y) that I need to Plot in 3D, however, the range of
> x is (0,1) while the range of y is (0,g(x)), where g(x) is some
> explicit function of x, say x^1/2. Is there a way to do it since
> specifying it directly the way I outlined above in Plot3D gives me the
> error message that "Plot3D :: plln: Limiting value g(x) in {y,0,g(x)}
> is not a machine-size real number". Perhaps I can do this indirectly
> by plotting two surfaces and then consider the relevant part of
> surface f(x,y), however, it would look ugly. Thanks.
>
See
http://groups.google.com/groups?threadm=694bal$km0 at smc.vnet.net
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Abbott Phone: +61 8 6488 2734
School of Physics, M013 Fax: +61 8 6488 1014
The University of Western Australia (CRICOS Provider No 00126G)
35 Stirling Highway
Crawley WA 6009 mailto:paul at physics.uwa.edu.au
AUSTRALIA http://physics.uwa.edu.au/~paul