Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2005
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Wierd problems with Mathematica - inversion of a 12x12 matrix

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg56090] Re: Wierd problems with Mathematica - inversion of a 12x12 matrix
  • From: David Bailey <dave at Remove_Thisdbailey.co.uk>
  • Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 04:47:31 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <d3lrsq$sef$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Madhusudan Singh wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I am solving a problem using f95 that involves solving a 12x12 coupled
> linear system. I have written out the matrix A (A x = f), and instead of
> calculating the inverse repeatedly for different values of the input 
> parameters, I am trying to calculate the symbolic inverse of the matrix,
> post multiply it with the RHS and code the resulting 12 equations for x_i 
> into fortran.
> 
> I believe this is the sensible way to do it, since this system needs to be
> solved lots of times (its part of a half-infinite integral) and inverting
> such a system numerically would not only be time consuming, but also
> obscure possible stability problems.
> 
> Now, I am using Mathematica 5.1 (multiprocessor Sun machine) to do it, but
> the inverse has been running for the past 40 minutes without any result. A
> prior attempt to run it with Mathematica 4.1 (single processor Pentium M
> Linux machine) resulted in an aborted process.
> 
> Out of a hunch, I just exported the notebook to text, and used "math" (the
> text version of Mathematica) to run it through. Less that two minutes
> later, I had an answer. The problem is that the answer (in nohup.out) is so
> ill formatted (I used MatrixForm with FullSimplify) that it is impossible to
> make sense of.
> 
> OTOH, the graphical Notebook is still chugging away. Has anyone seen this
> odd behaviour before ?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
This is only a guess (because you have not supplied any actual code), 
but make sure your matrix only contains real numbers before you attempt 
to invert it - use N if necessary. A simple example will show you what 
can happen otherwise:

{{1, 2, 3}, {7, 1, 7}, {9, 4, 7}} // Inverse

Mathematica tries to perform the inversion by exact rational arithmetic, 
and that gets a bit expensive with a 12x12!

David Bailey
dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk


  • Prev by Date: Re: DSolve doesn't solve easy dif. equation?
  • Next by Date: Re: Wierd problems with Mathematica - inversion of a 12x12 matrix
  • Previous by thread: Re: Wierd problems with Mathematica - inversion of a 12x12 matrix
  • Next by thread: sparse matrix question