[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Converting a mapping into a well-defined function
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg56525] Re: [mg56499] Converting a mapping into a well-defined function
*From*: Bob Hanlon <hanlonr at cox.net>
*Date*: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 02:40:12 -0400 (EDT)
*Reply-to*: hanlonr at cox.net
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Your example output appears to violate your prohibition against sorting the
result.
A={{a,5},{b,27},{a,14},{c,4},{e,94},{b,6},{d,9},{e,4}};
B=A//. {s___,{x_,y_},m___,{x_,_},f___}:>
{s,{x,y},m,f}
{{a, 5}, {b, 27}, {c, 4}, {e, 94}, {d, 9}}
Bob Hanlon
>
> From: "Gilmar" <gilmar.rodriguez at nwfwmd.state.fl.us>
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
> Date: 2005/04/26 Tue PM 09:53:32 EDT
> To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
> Subject: [mg56525] [mg56499] Converting a mapping into a well-defined function
>
> Dear Mathematica User Friends:
>
> I need to build a module that takes a non-empty set A
> (whose elements are 2-tuples), and appends (or not) those 2-tuples
> to a set B according to the following criteria:
>
> (1.) if the abscissa of a 2-tuple in A is unique (among the abscissas
> of all the other 2-tuples in A), then the module appends that 2-tuple
> to the set B.
>
> (2.) if there are n 2-tuples in A that share the same abscissa, then
> the module appends the first of those 2-tuples to B ("first" here means
> the first of such n 2-tuple encountered, as you read A from left to
> right),but does not append the rest to B.
>
> (3.) the module does not attempt to sort the set B, after the appending
> process is completed.
>
> Example:
>
> If A = {{a,5},{b,27},{a,14},{c,4},{e,94},{b,6},{d,9},{e,4}}
>
> then
>
> B=Module[A]={{a,5},{b,27},{c,4},{d,9},{e,94}}.
>
> Another way to re-phrase the above example;
>
> if A defines a mapping:
>
> A(a)=5, A(b)=27, A(a)=14, A(c)=4, A(e)=94, A(b)=6, A(d)=9, A(e)=4
>
> them the module converts the mapping A into a well-defined function:
>
> A(a)=5, A(b)=27, A(c)=4, A(d)=9, A(e)=94.
>
> Thank you for your help!
>
>
Prev by Date:
** Re: Converting a mapping into a well-defined function**
Next by Date:
**Re: Re: odd mathematica blindspot**
Previous by thread:
** Re: Converting a mapping into a well-defined function**
Next by thread:
** Re: Converting a mapping into a well-defined function**
| |