MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

NullSpace[m], why different result for symbolic vs numerical matrix?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg59206] NullSpace[m], why different result for symbolic vs numerical matrix?
  • From: "Nasser Abbasi" <nma at 12000.org>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 00:42:28 -0400 (EDT)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

 
hello, This 5.2 on windows.

The help for NullSpace function says:

"NullSpace works on both numerical and symbolic matrices. "

But why do I get different answer if matrix A is numeric vs symbolic?

What Am I missing?

Both answers are correct in the sense that A times each of null 
vectors produced does give 0.

------------
 Remove["Global`*"]
A = {{0, 1, 1, 2}, {1, 2, 3, 4}, {2, 0, 2, 0}};
m1 = NullSpace[A]
m2 = NullSpace[N[A, 16]]


Out[190]= {{0, -2, 0, 1}, {-1, -1, 1, 0}}

Out[191]=
{{0.5286741846941267165032578206`16., -0.4493204281752718232493645376`16.,
   -0.5286741846941267165032578206`16., 
0.488997306434699269876311179`16.},
  {-0.4183886482487962269364866589`16., -0.78504329244074722971820122`16., 
0.4183886482487962269364866589`16.,
   0.1833273220959755013908572806`16.}}

-------------

thanks
Nasser



  • Prev by Date: Re: "Cascaded sums"?
  • Next by Date: Re: Mathematica: Assistance requested.
  • Previous by thread: Re: "Cascaded sums"?
  • Next by thread: Re: NullSpace[m], why different result for symbolic vs numerical matrix?