Re: Re: BlankSequence
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg59258] Re: [mg59199] Re: BlankSequence
- From: "David Park" <djmp at earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 01:20:00 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Daniele, I tried to reply to you privately, after deleting the no spam part, using the email address: danwolf at libero.it but it was rejected with the message that the mailbox was full. So, if you want a private reply you will have to give me a working address. David Park djmp at earthlink.net http://home.earthlink.net/~djmp/ From: Daniele Lupo [mailto:danwolf_no_spam_please_ at libero.it] To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net Hi. I've resolved my problem in another way. My data are stored in this way: d= {{"data1"},{"data2"},...} where dataN are lists of xy points {x1,y1},{x2,y2}... So, I've created the function in this way: MultipleListSmith[lista_List,options___]:=... using lista_List, instead of {lista__}. After this, I've recreated the transformation of the list, inside my function, in this way: listaUV = lista /.{x_Real,y_Real}->{RXToU[x, y], RXToV[x, y]} instead of the creation of a pure function that is mapped into this list: my problem was the changing of points from one type of coordinates (Cartesian) to another (Smith chart), so in this way I apply the transformation to every pair of numbers (my data are experimental, so I've only numbers). Anyway, your suggestion did not worked with my problem, because my pure function does not map properly into my list of data :-( In this way, I've created the sets that I need to be plotted. Now, I've another problem with plotting (a little problem), but this is another topic... Anyway, thanks for your helps; I'll use them in my next problems, for sure. Daniele