MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: Some bugs in Mathematica

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg59410] Re: [mg59395] Re: Some bugs in Mathematica
  • From: Daniel Lichtblau <danl at wolfram.com>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 03:30:42 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <200508010505.BAA24522@smc.vnet.net> <1192.12.210.86.190.1123296535.squirrel@webmail.wolfram.com> <BAY106-DAV184D0BD361AEF55157E0CBC9C60@phx.gbl> <42F50087.5050308@wolfram.com> <BAY106-DAV47DC8237BFF1A81020924C9C60@phx.gbl> <dd4fhp$huv$1@smc.vnet.net> posting-account=xXq2jwwAAACHPbMF3D2ViewAYYQLjlYJ <200508080734.DAA03475@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

akhmel at hotmail.com wrote:
> Regretfully, you mistyped the expression for the antiderivative and
> therefore, when you tried to do the differentiation, it didn't work.
> 
> The correct expression is:
> 
> 1/(a*b)*ArcTanh[(b*Sqrt[r^2 - a^2]) / (a*Sqrt[r^2 - b*2])]

The original was laced with both forward and backward slashes. I mistook 
one to be a line continuation rather than a division. As I have noted in 
past, use of Mathematica InputForm would avoid such ambiguity.


> In order to avoid misunderstanding, I describe the argument of ArcTanh
> verbally: it is a fraction. [...]
> What is your position within Wolfram Research? Are you in charge of
> public relation?

I have worked in the Kernel Development Group (under various different 
names) since 1991. I do not know if it was intended, but I have a 
feeling people at WRI who read your question will find it quite funny.

I gather you once worked at DayJet? What is it you do nowadays, there or 
elsewhere? From the queries I have seen regarding symbolic integrals I 
would venture to guess it is not optimization in flight/crew scheduling? 
Regardless, you now know what it is I do and I think a response to this, 
in private email if you prefer, is in order.


> Sincerely,
> 
> Alex
> [...]

Daniel Lichtblau
Wolfram Research


  • Prev by Date: Mathematica goes Bad
  • Next by Date: Re: Redefining a function with a rule for coefficients
  • Previous by thread: Re: Some bugs in Mathematica
  • Next by thread: Re: Some bugs in Mathematica