[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Types in Mathematica thread

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg62844] Re: [mg62824] Re: [mg62787] Re: [mg62781] Re: [mg62708] Types in Mathematica thread
• From: ggroup at sarj.ca
• Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 03:58:49 -0500 (EST)
• References: <dmp9na$hi2$1@smc.vnet.net> <roadnYOk3NcFDw7eRVn-jg@speakeasy.net> <200512050837.DAA08425@smc.vnet.net> <200512051840.NAA21063@smc.vnet.net> <200512060503.AAA02736@smc.vnet.net>
• Reply-to: ggroup at sarj.ca
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

On Tuesday, December 6, 2005 at 00:03 GMT -0500, Kristen W Carlson wrote:

> Andrzej, why there isn't a test for transcendentals--TranscendentalQ.

From Mathworld <http://mathworld.wolfram.com/TranscendentalNumber.html>:
   A number  can then be tested to see if it is transcendental using
   the Mathematica command Not[Element[x, Algebraics]].

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Types in Mathematica thread
    • From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl>

• References:
  • Re: Types in Mathematica thread
    • From: Kristen W Carlson <carlsonkw@gmail.com>
  • Re: Re: Types in Mathematica thread
    • From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl>
  • Re: Re: Re: Types in Mathematica thread
    • From: Kristen W Carlson <carlsonkw@Gmail.com>