       Re: functional programming

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg63013] Re: functional programming
• From: dh <dh at metrohm.ch>
• Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 04:56:35 -0500 (EST)
• Organization: TDC Switzerland AG, http://www.sunrise.ch
• References: <dnecum\$t4e\$1@smc.vnet.net>
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

```Hi Mike,
You do not need to make a table if you only want a few elements.
Table[dioph[x, k], {x, 0, 10}, {k, 0, 10}];
try:
res={};
Do[If[(t=dioph[x, k])!=Null,AppendTo[res,t], {x, 0, 10}, {k, 0, 10}];

Daniel

mike_in_england2000 at yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> Hi All
>
> As a long time C++ programmer I am terrible at functional programming.
> I recently replied to a post on here concerning diophantine equations
> and provided the following code:
>
> dioph[x_, k_] := (5 x)^2 - 2^k*3*(5 + k)^2 - 131*k - 7
> Reap[
>   Do[
>     Do[
>       If[dioph[x, k] == 0, Sow[{x, k}];];
>       , {x, 0, 1000}
>       ]
>     , {k, 0, 1000}
>     ]]
>
> Someone else came up with a more efficient way of doing this and it was
> a nice solution.  However my question is this - How could I have
> rewritten my orginal code using Functional programming?  Nothing fancy
> - just a literal translation using the ideas of functional programming.
>
> I tried
>
> dioph[x_, k_] := If[(5 x)^2 - 2^k*3*(5 + k)^2 - 131*k - 7 == 0, {x,
> k}];
> Table[dioph[x, k], {x, 0, 10}, {k, 0, 10}];
>
> which is similar to something that was posted on here a while back but
> I hit the same problem they did - The If statement returns Null when
> the statement is false so you end up with large lists of Nulls.  Not
> good if I want to look at large ranges of numbers.
>
> Any advice would be welcomed
> Thanks,
> Mike
>

```

• Prev by Date: Re: functional programming
• Next by Date: Re: Roman Maeder's Classes.m
• Previous by thread: Re: functional programming
• Next by thread: Re: functional programming