[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Expression timing; a black art?
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg63251] Re: [mg63234] Expression timing; a black art?
*From*: "Carl K. Woll" <carlw at wolfram.com>
*Date*: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 23:35:35 -0500 (EST)
*References*: <200512200919.EAA28501@smc.vnet.net>
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
AES wrote:
> OK, to follow up on my own recent post, I did some timing tests for the
> function I asked about earlier, as a function or as a Module[] with a
> repeated square root pulled out. To say the results are puzzling (to
> me, anyway) is putting it mildly.
>
> Approach: Create a notebook with three sections, each of the form:
>
> x; Remove["Global`*"];
> fn := (function as below)
> a=0.12; xmax=3.5; dx=0.1;
> tn=Timing[Table[{x, fn[a,x]//N}, {x,0,xmax,dx}]];
>
> where the three functions "fn" are:
>
> f1[a_,x_] := Sum[Exp[-(Pi a n)^2-
> ((x-n Sqrt[1-(Pi a^2)^2])/a)^2],
> {n,-Infinity,Infinity}];
>
> f2[a_,x_] := Module[{b},
> b=Sqrt[1-(Pi a^2)^2];
> Sum[Exp[-(Pi a n)^2-((x-n b)/a)^2],
> {n,-Infinity,Infinity}]];
>
> f3[a_,x_] := Module[{b,c1,c2},
> b=Sqrt[1-(Pi a^2)^2];
> c1=(Pi a)^2;
> c2=1/a^2;
> Sum[Exp[-c1 n^2-c2(x-n b)^2],
> {n,-Infinity,Infinity}]];
>
> Summary of results to date:
>
> 1) Open Mathematica, run notebook first time with functions in f1, f2,
> f3 order. Timings are (in round numbers, +/-10%) t1 = 30 sec, t2 = 5
> sec, t3 = 20 sec.
>
> 2) Re-run same notebook from top: Timings are now 5 sec, 5 sec, 5 sec.
> Clearly Mathematica is remembering *something* from the first run, despite the
> Remove[Global] in each section . . . ?
>
> 3) Quit Mathematica, re-Open, reorder sections in f2, f1, f3 order. Timings on
> first run are now t2 = 30 sec, t1 = 5 sec, t3 = 20 sec; timings on
> second run are again 5, 5, 5 sec.
>
> 4) Quit Mathematica, re-Open, reorder sections in f3, f2, f1 order. Timings on
> first run are 30, 20, 5 sec.
>
> Conclusion #1: Running *either* f1 or f2 once leaves something (?) in
> the kernel that greatly speeds up the f2 or f1, and gives a little help
> to f3. Running f3 first gives a little help to f2 (30 down to 20), and
> probably also to f1 (didn't try), but doesn't push it all the way down
> to 5.
>
> Conclusion #2: Using modular form with Sqrt[] pulled out doesn't help
> at all.
>
> Conclusion #3: If a naive user like me had only done the very first
> test above, I'd have been left believing that pulling the Sqrt[] out
> *did* help.
>
> Conclusion #4: Trying to understand Mathematica timing is a very black art.
>
> Hypothesis: Running any of these functions on a *random* set of values
> the first time, then another random set the second time, will *not*
> speed up the second run for either the same fn or any of the other ones.
> Anyone want to predict if this is so?
Mathematica caches some results. If you want to clear these cached
values, use Developer`ClearCache[]. In your example, running ClearCache
before the second run should result in similar times for the second run
as the first run.
Carl Woll
Wolfram Research
Prev by Date:
**Re: Speeding up simple Mathematica expressions?**
Next by Date:
**Re: Unexpected behavior of Simplify**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Expression timing; a black art?**
Next by thread:
**Converting Strings to Ints.**
| |