|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Re: Re: Bug Report - Two numerical values for a same variable
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg54324] Re: [mg54300] Re: [mg54271] Re: Bug Report - Two numerical values for a same variable
- From: Sseziwa Mukasa <mukasa at jeol.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:30:43 -0500 (EST)
- References: <00ed01c512b0$2f242850$6400a8c0@Main> <curpbn$r28$1@smc.vnet.net> <200502150438.XAA29728@smc.vnet.net> <200502161936.OAA19223@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
On Feb 16, 2005, at 2:36 PM, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
> The manipulations below are precisely what's so confusing about
> Rational
> objects (and Complex objects) being atoms. If
>
> 1/2 /. Rational[x_, 2] -> Rational[x, 7]
>
> works, then why not the following?
>
> Part[Rational[1, 2], 2]
Because by definition you cannot use Part on an atom, actually the Help
Browser says you specifically can't use Map, but I assume Part is
treated like Map with respect to Atoms. On the other hand /.
apparently doesn't have the same restriction. I know it sounds pat, I
don't have a good reason for asserting Replace works differently from
Part with respect to atoms except for the fact that it does.
Regards,
Ssezi
Prev by Date:
Re: Apply on MultipleListPlot using pure functions
Next by Date:
Re: Apply on MultipleListPlot using pure functions
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Bug Report - Two numerical values for a same variable
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Re: Re: Bug Report - Two numerical values for a same variable
|