[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: Bug Report - Two numerical values for a same variable

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg54433] Re: Bug Report - Two numerical values for a same variable
• From: Richard Fateman <fateman at cs.berkeley.edu>
• Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 00:09:59 -0500 (EST)
• Organization: University of California, Berkeley
• References: <00ed01c512b0$2f242850$6400a8c0@Main> <curpbn$r28$1@smc.vnet.net> <200502150438.XAA29728@smc.vnet.net> <200502161936.OAA19223@smc.vnet.net> <bc260b75189ab899a75c3a5c65dc0bcf@gmail.com> <4214B60F.2050207@math.umass.edu> <7264774360d595ba92f3e713df810465@mimuw.edu.pl> <cv6ru9$6jj$1@smc.vnet.net> <42177C45.5090205@cs.berkeley.edu> <a5427d79c9fda3403abd8d2423f334e0@mimuw.edu.pl>
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Andrzej Kozlowski wrote:

> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
> On 19 Feb 2005, at 18:49, Richard Fateman wrote:
> 
>>
>> The fact that these are stand-ins for well-known mathematically real
>> quantities is irrelevant to Mathematica, since it only understands Real,
>> and Real is a subset of mathematical real.
>>
> 
> This is simply untrue in modern versions of Mathematica:
> 
> In[4]:=
> Element[Pi,Reals]
> 
> Out[4]=
> True
> 
  Check your spelling.

  Real is the Head of a floating point number.

Reals   (note the "s") at the end,  is a domain name.

Mathematica misuses the term Real which has a well-known meaning
in mathematics.

The presence of a test whereby E is known to be mathematically real
is irrelevant to the use of a data-structure-building program that
takes two numeric inputs and produces a pair of numbers. The matter
at issue is the evaluation of Complex[a,b]  not Element[??,Complexes].




> and so on. Mathematica certianly undersands Reals, 

I would not say the Mathematica  >>>understands<<< reals.

it is just that Real
> an Reals, Complex and Complexes, Rational and Rationals play different 
> roles. The former are somewhat akin to types in other languages

Yes, and that (former) is what was being discussed.

  and are
> usued basically for programming the latter are used for mathematics. 

No, it is not mathematics. It is symbolic manipulation.  That is why
(1-Sqrt[z])*(1+Sqrt[z])-z  is not known to be Real.  (neither True nor False).
Simplify,  a symbolic manipulation procedure, helps.  In mathematics,
the truth of the statement does not depend on applying procedures like
Simplify.

I
> find it perfectly satisfactory, knowing your opinions I am sure you 
> don't but that is all this amounts to and nothing one can argue about.

I suspect that Mathematica's routines for testing for membership in
domains like Reals etc.  are pretty good.  I don't, however, expect it
to understand anything. Just symbolic manipulation.  That's different.

> 
> 
> Andrzej Kozlowski
> 

• References:
  • Re: Bug Report - Two numerical values for a same variable
    • From: Scott Hemphill <hemphill@hemphills.net>
  • Re: Re: Bug Report - Two numerical values for a same variable
    • From: Murray Eisenberg <murray@math.umass.edu>