Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2005
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: SparseArray, DensityGraphics, ContourGraphics, and SurfaceGraphics

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg54706] Re: SparseArray, DensityGraphics, ContourGraphics, and SurfaceGraphics
  • From: Jon Harrop <usenet at jdh30.plus.com>
  • Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:29:54 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <cvc84d$qrb$1@smc.vnet.net> <cvk485$dat$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Jens-Peer Kuska wrote:
> what has a sparse matrix to do with a density graphics ?

RLE.

> ArrayPlot[] is only used to visualize the sparse matrix, but
> all the memory saving of the sparse matrix are destroyed when you
> expand every entry in the matrix (not only the non zero values) to a
> 3D Polygon[] with 4 corners in Plot3D[] ...

Only if you tesselate uniformly. If you adaptively subdivide then you can
retain sparseness.

> It seems a good design decision not to support this nonsens ...

The OPs question is perfectly valid. The answer, I suspect, is simply that
WRI have not yet implemented it. Although not insurmountable, this is not a
trivial problem to solve properly.

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
http://ffconsultancy.com


  • Prev by Date: Precise bitmaps
  • Next by Date: Construcing correlation matrix from time-ordered list
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: SparseArray, DensityGraphics, ContourGraphics, and SurfaceGraphics
  • Next by thread: Most plotting not working...?