[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: how to find n in expression x^n using a pattern?
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg58456] Re: [mg58426] how to find n in expression x^n using a pattern?
*From*: Andrzej Kozlowski <akozlowski at gmail.com>
*Date*: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 03:57:08 -0400 (EDT)
*References*: <200507020806.EAA01589@smc.vnet.net>
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
On 2 Jul 2005, at 17:06, steve wrote:
> I am learning patterns in Mathemtica, and I thought this will be easy.
>
> suppose you are given a factored expression, such as x^n(x^2+2)(x^3+4)
> where 'n' above can be any number, including zero (i.e. there is no
> (x) as a separate factor). I need to find 'n', which can be
> 0,1,2,3,..etc..
>
> i.e I need to find the power of the factor x by itself if it exist in
> the expression. not (x^n+anything), just (x^n) byitself.
>
> For example
>
> p= x (x^2+2) ---> here n=1
>
> I tried this
>
> p /. x^n_(any_) -> n
>
> This did not work since x^1 does not match pattern x^n_. I would have
> worked if I had x^2 (x^3+2) for example.
>
> I know that I need to use something like x^_:1 to make it match x,
> which
> is really x^1, but I do not know how to use it in a replacement rule,
> becuase
> when I write
>
> p /. (x^n_:1)(any_) -> n
>
> it is an error.
>
> If I write
>
> p /. (x^_:1)(any_) -> _
>
> I do not get back anything.
>
> Next I tried the Cases command, and again had no luck.
>
> The main problem is that Mathematica makes a difference between
> x, x^1, and x^2, etc... when it comes to matching with pattern x^n_
>
> any idea how to do this?
> thanks,
> steve
>
>
Actually there are many problems with your approach. First of all,
your Attempt to use optional fails because of syntax. You shoudl have
had
x^(n_:1) or x^Optional[Pattern[n, Blank[]], 1]. But in any case the
result what have been quite different form what I think you expected:
p= x (x^2+2);
p/.x^(n_:1)->n
4
Of course what happened was that x was replaced by 1 and x^2 by 2.
This is not the way to "find the power of the factor x by itself".
Perhaps what you would have preferred is something like:
Cases[x (x^2+2) , x^(n_:1)->n,{1,2}]
{1,2}
Note however that you have to be careful about the levels here. There
is a x on Level 1 of the expression and x^2 at level 2.
In fact level 1 looks like this:
Level[p, {1}]
{x, x^2 + 2}
and level 2 like:
Level[p, {2}]
{2, x^2}
But there is also x at level 3:
Level[p, {3}]
{x,2}
Which means that if you uses Cases with the commonly used level
setting Infinity you would get a misleading answer:
=
Cases[x (x^2+2) , x^(n_:1)->n,Infinity]
{1,1,2}
You do not tell us whether you are simply learning to use patterns or
trying t solve some problem in polynomial algebra. for the latter
task patterns are generally not the right tool to use, instead one
should use GroebnerBasis and PolynomialReduce. But there is not much
point in trying to answer questions nobody asked asked ;-)
Andrzej Kozlowski
Chiba, JAPAN
Prev by Date:
**Re: How to suppress plot output ?**
Next by Date:
**Re: Re: Can't assign value to symbols**
Previous by thread:
**how to find n in expression x^n using a pattern?**
Next by thread:
**Re: how to find n in expression x^n using a pattern?**
| |