MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: FrameTicks bug

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg58635] Re: [mg58630] FrameTicks bug
  • From: "David Park" <djmp at earthlink.net>
  • Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 04:19:21 -0400 (EDT)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Option 1: Make up a Table of the ticks using the information in the Ticks
Help. Do you also want the small intermediary tick marks? Then don't forget
to include them. Do you want ticks with no values on the opposite sides?
Then make up tables for them.

Option 2:

Needs["DrawGraphics`DrawingMaster`"]

Plot[Sin[x], {x, 0, 10},
    Frame -> True,
    FrameTicks ->
      {None,
       CustomTicks[Identity, {-1, 1, 0.5, 5}],
       CustomTicks[Identity, {0, 10, 2, 5}],
       None},
    ImageSize -> 500];

That creates the big (labeled) and small (unlabeled) ticks on the left and
top sides, but no ticks on the right and bottom sides. If you want unlabeled
ticks on the right and bottom use...

Plot[Sin[x], {x, 0, 10},
    Frame -> True,
    FrameTicks ->
      {CustomTicks[Identity, {0, 10, 2, 5}, CTNumberFunction -> ("" &)],
       CustomTicks[Identity, {-1, 1, 0.5, 5}],
       CustomTicks[Identity, {0, 10, 2, 5}],
       CustomTicks[Identity, {-1, 1, 0.5, 5}, CTNumberFunction -> ("" &)]},
    ImageSize -> 500];

David Park
djmp at earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~djmp/


From: AES [mailto:siegman at stanford.edu]
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net


Well, I guess it's not actually a bug, but . . .


FrameTicks -> {Automatic, Automatic, None, None}

puts tick marks AND numerical labels on bottom and left edges.


FrameTicks -> {None, Automatic, Automatic, None}

puts tick marks and numerical labels on left edge, tick
marks and NO NUMERICAL LABELS on top edge.


How can I put the same Automatic numbers that would
have been created for the bottom edge, on the top edge?



  • Prev by Date: Re: Complement replacement
  • Next by Date: Re: superscripts
  • Previous by thread: Re: FrameTicks bug
  • Next by thread: //N bug, but WHY?