Re: limit problem

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg58942] Re: [mg58910] limit problem*From*: stephen layland <layland at wolfram.com>*Date*: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 01:22:01 -0400 (EDT)*References*: <200507230932.FAA29066@smc.vnet.net>*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

and thus spake Chris Chiasson [2005.07.23 @ 05:08]: > Dear MathGroup, > Honestly, I see no reason why this should return "unevaluated" instead of zero. > > FullSimplify[Limit[E^(-R t),t\[Rule]Infinity],Infinity>R>0&&Element[R,Reals]] I do. Limit doesn't know anything about R and FullSimplify only applies known transformation rules (which, to my knowledge, don't mess with expressions of head Limit[]) to the expression passed in. Pass Assumptions to Limit instead. -- /*------------------------------*\ | stephen layland | | Documentation Programmer | | http://members.wri.com/layland | \*------------------------------*/

**References**:**limit problem***From:*Chris Chiasson <chris.chiasson@gmail.com>