|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Re: Gigahertz Benchmarks in a world of multicores
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg59002] Re: [mg58946] Re: Gigahertz Benchmarks in a world of multicores
- From: "Hobbs, Sylvia (DPH)" <Sylvia.Hobbs at state.ma.us>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:02:51 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Lots of benchmarks, as Yasvir's laptop also revealed, have shown the lower
gig Pentium M to be a faster single-chip, say, a 3-gig M is faster than a 5
Gig Pentium 4. However Heath, would one say POWERFUL? I would say that the
Pentium M is LESS Nietzschean, and almost dialectical (in the classical
Hegelian sense) since its processing efficiency is based on low frequency
and voltage which responds to mobile tool design needs.
Sylvia Hobbs
-----Original Message-----
From: Heath Gerhardt [mailto:heathgerhardt at hotmail.com]
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
Subject: [mg59002] [mg58946] Re: Gigahertz Benchmarks in a world of multicores
The Pentium M is actually more powerful than both the Pentium 4 and the
Athlon 64:
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20050525/index.html
Heath
Hobbs, Sylvia (DPH) wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Yes Yasvir, definitely an amusing epiphany for your little laptop. Sounds
> like a Tortoise and Hare matrix transposition race. Gigahertz benchmark
> races are going to become stranger and stranger (or become obsolescent),
> what with the new Pentium D true multicore having two Pentium 4 processor
> cores on a single die (or rather multichip). Software needs to progress to
> exploit multicores to notice a difference. Also, won't we live in an even
> more exciting world when the new Longhorn Operating System has her
> Debutante's Ball in Fall 2006?
>
> Sylvia Hobbs
>
> PS: If your cat is always getting near my computer screen, especially when
> you are transposing matrices, consider this website for how to clean your
> monitor: http://www.legrady.hu/sc.html
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yasvir A. Tesiram [mailto:tesiramy at omrf.ouhsc.edu]
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
> Subject: [mg59002] [mg58946] ?
>
> Hi,
> This Benchmark test has had me intrigued for some time, especially in
> Linux systems where system libraries change continuously. And I was
> especially amused when my little 2.0GHz Pentium M laptop (Debian
> Linux kernel 2.6.12) outdid a Redhat 9 Pentium4 3.2GHz and the Athlon 64
> 3200+ (Suse Linux) when it came to Transposing matrices. I guess thats
> where the buck stopped, because it was thoroughly thrashed on all other
> accounts.
>
> Cheers
> Yas
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
>
>
>>That's plausible -- but a bit surprising to me given benchmark results
>>for my machine vs. some of the reference systems:
>>
>> 2p 2.4 GHz Opteron 250 (Sun Solaris 10): 1.45
>>mine -> 3.2 GHz Pentium 4 Extreme Edition (Windows XP Pro): 1.42
>> 2p 2.5 GHz G5 Apple Mac OS 10.41): 1.15
>>
>>I guess raw processor speed really makes a difference with these
>
> benchmarks.
>
>>
>>Sseziwa Mukasa wrote:
>>
>>>My guess would be dual processor. With the option for more, eg 4p for
>>>a quad processor.
>>>
>>>On Jul 18, 2005, at 3:21 AM, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Mathematica's version 5.2 StandardPackages Utilities`Benchmark`
>>>>identifies several of the reference systems as "2p" -- e.g., "2p 1.4
>
> GHz
>
>>>>Itanium 2", "2p 2.5 GHz G5".
>>>>
>>>>What does the "2p" mean?
>>>>--
>>>>Murray Eisenberg murray at math.umass.edu
>>>>Mathematics & Statistics Dept.
>>>>Lederle Graduate Research Tower phone 413 549-1020 (H)
>>>>University of Massachusetts 413 545-2859 (W)
>>>>710 North Pleasant Street fax 413 545-1801
>>>>Amherst, MA 01003-9305
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>--
>>Murray Eisenberg murray at math.umass.edu
>>Mathematics & Statistics Dept.
>>Lederle Graduate Research Tower phone 413 549-1020 (H)
>>University of Massachusetts 413 545-2859 (W)
>>710 North Pleasant Street fax 413 545-1801
>>Amherst, MA 01003-9305
>>
>
>
Prev by Date:
Re: Mathematica 5.2: The 64-bit and multicore release
Next by Date:
Mathematica on Slackware Linux
Previous by thread:
Re: Gigahertz Benchmarks in a world of multicores
Next by thread:
Combinatorica functions doc
|